Phone Farm

Loading compute health board

Scoring retained benchmark history, confidence thresholds, and device compute regressions.

Resolving route12%

Acurast Pulse

Loading live view

Syncing chain state, reward ledgers, and fleet telemetry.

Resolving route12%

Manager Health #804 | Acurast Pulse

Manager #804 · compute baseline

Latest benchmark vs last 200 retained metric samples · ≥30 samples required to score

30.3% healthy·30d↓15.8pp

LiveUpdated just now·Refresh now ↻

152 devices

59Healthy

15Watch

78Investigate

0Low confidence

78Regressions

49Improving

1Stale heartbeat

78Failures

6.2ACU/day at risk

Non-Green 93 Investigate 78 Watch 15 Healthy 59 Improving 49▥ Down in Compare ▥ Stale in Compare ▥ CPU variance in Compare ▥ Improving in Compare (8)

▥ Investigate in Compare (78) ▾

How are these conditions scored?Quick FAQ

● Healthy: All monitored pools (CPU 1c, CPU Mc, RAM) score within 5 % of this phone model's median. Treated as a good baseline — nothing to act on.
● Watch: At least one pool is 5–10 % below the model median on the latest run. A nudge, not yet an actionable problem.
● Investigate: At least one pool is 10 % or more below the model median. Persistent gaps that warrant a closer look — usually thermal throttling, background load, or a bad firmware release.
● Low confidence: The device hasn't reported enough benchmark runs to score it reliably. One of: brand-new device (first seen < 72 h ago), too few samples (< 30 baseline observations), or no benchmark history at all.
● Regressions: Devices with 3 or more consecutive non-healthy benchmark runs. A single bad run is noise; three in a row is a pattern. The streak resets the moment a healthy run lands.
● Improving: Devices with 3 or more trailing healthy runs immediately after at least one non-healthy run in recent history. The mirror of Regressions — recoveries worth celebrating, and a signal that whatever you changed is working.
● ACU/day at risk: Estimated daily ACU lost vs a healthy baseline, not the total earnings of flagged devices. Each non-healthy device's ACU/day is weighted by how far below its model median it scored — a device 12% below contributes ~12% of its earnings, not 100%. Watch and Investigate items without a measured delta fall back to status floors (5–10%).
● Stale heartbeat: Last heartbeat was over 50 minutes ago (stale) or over 6 hours ago (down). Healthy heartbeats land every ~50 minutes; anything past that suggests the device is offline or unreachable.
● Failures: Devices with a composite risk score ≥ 75. The score blends benchmark drop, heartbeat lag, and on-chain execution failures; the threshold marks devices that need attention soon.

Per-model rollup7 modelsClick to expand

Model	Devices	Healthy	Watch	Investigate	% Healthy	Improving
BLU View 5	35	0	6	29	0.0%	4
Untagged	34	0	6	28	0.0%	1
TCL Ion X

ModelBuildSortShowing 93 of 93

Alias▽Processor▽Device▽CPU 1c▽CPU Mc▽RAM▽Worst▽Trend

—

5DoYh1739tpDC2...s6RMqLFdMMCOREFlagged 25h

Single CPU -5.2% · Risk 77 · 16m lag · 2 failures

—

-5.2%

+10.2%

+0.0%

-5.2%

▸

—

5DPe4JbGitJ8ZV...XeQfS8u5YnCOREFlagged 27h

Multi CPU -8.3% · Risk 77 · 27m lag · 2 failures

—

+0.2%

-8.3%

0.0%

-8.3%

▸

—

5DTN67xMcT2sH5...wEBbJiePJ2COREFlagged 25h

Single CPU -6.8% · Risk 77 · 23m lag · 2 failures

TCL Ion X

-6.8%

+11.3%

0.0%

-6.8%

▸

—

5FRK5wD4cHdW6g...3yyW9AvMdBCOREFlagged 29h

Multi CPU -7.6% · Risk 77 · 14m lag · 1 failure

—

+0.0%

-7.6%

+0.0%

-7.6%

▸

—

5GJNAiGsWJPQY1...6q6eZhmU6mCOREFlagged 11h

Single CPU -5.3% · Risk 77 · 8m lag · 1 failure

—

-5.3%

+21.4%

-0.0%

-5.3%

▸

—

5CsxxxHBCHzPag...mUoJcE7TczCOREFlagged 18h

Single CPU -5.5% · Risk 87 · 20m lag · 3 failures

—

-5.5%

+49.5%

-0.0%

-5.5%

▸

—

5Dk9oMHJFt7RSR...bSwGDdnQfsCOREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -9.1% · Risk 87 · 5m lag · 4 failures

TCL Ion X

+21.8%

-9.1%

0.0%

-9.1%

▸

—

5DQtQpLpPA4B5z...z3im9AMKkRCOREFlagged 35h+

Single CPU -7.6% · Risk 87 · 26m lag · 4 failures

TCL 50XE

-7.6%

+26.2%

+0.0%

-7.6%

▸

—

5DrGWoZDf9uqDP...V4g4kZxRuHCOREFlagged 12h

Multi CPU -5.5% · Risk 87 · 6m lag · 3 failures

—

-0.2%

-5.5%

-0.0%

-5.5%

▸

—

5ETkkUGDWyGgj8...j9rhQ47dkeCOREFlagged 27h

Multi CPU -6.0% · Risk 87 · 3m lag · 3 failures

BLU View 5

-3.0%

-6.0%

0.0%

-6.0%

▸

—

5Ga8RWsyB8hL97...FZFjtaoocbCOREFlagged 17h

Single CPU -6.0% · Risk 87 · 30m lag · 3 failures

—

-6.0%

+4.3%

+0.0%

-6.0%

▸

—

5GTKWndd58UyJ1...drjHwn74jMCOREFlagged 21h

Multi CPU -8.6% · Risk 87 · 12m lag · 3 failures

—

+2.5%

-8.6%

+0.0%

-8.6%

▸

—

5DVd7grcu3JLQZ...JEmmy7FU2vCOREFlagged 21h

Single CPU -5.8% · Risk 94 · 28m lag · 9 failures

BLU View 5

-5.8%

+9.3%

0.0%

-5.8%

▸

—

5DXBm7wzdFBwbX...63MEN78JQwCOREFlagged 21h

Multi CPU -6.9% · Risk 94 · 3m lag · 4 failures

TCL Ion X

+1.7%

-6.9%

0.0%

-6.9%

▸

—

5EKGbUkNgHEdSV...kDHSdkfeAsCOREFlagged 35h+

Multi CPU -5.2% · Risk 94 · 4m lag · 10 failures

BLU View 5

+10.8%

-5.2%

0.0%

-5.2%

▸

—

5FLiD2gKc88ZKt...vginmfsrp2COREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -8.7% · Risk 94 · 5m lag · 10 failures

BLU View 5

+1.1%

-8.7%

0.0%

-8.7%

▸

—

5Fp2gwsFjK3NBu...gfCQdYUDzgCOREFlagged 17h

Multi CPU -9.5% · Risk 94 · 2m lag · 7 failures

—

+6.0%

-9.5%

-0.0%

-9.5%

▸

—

5GM4VGpH7wgHG6...PgVbeE8jGkCOREFlagged 18h

Single CPU -5.4% · Risk 94 · 2m lag · 6 failures

BLU View 5

-5.4%

+1.9%

0.0%

-5.4%

▸

—

5GvayGR11hLU6b...1pRbuE4o4PCOREFlagged 18h

Single CPU -8.1% · Risk 94 · 7m lag · 9 failures

—

-8.1%

+48.9%

-0.0%

-8.1%

▸

—

5E2vWknHm8V6Ny...sjdK8tmNwdCOREFlagged 32h

Multi CPU -12.4% · Risk 95 · 21m lag

—

+0.4%

-12.4%

+0.0%

-12.4%

▸

—

5CGmQSLPG3Ze7c...Z72f3qvN1vCOREFlagged 29h

Multi CPU -47.4% · Risk 100 · 3m lag · 4 failures

TCL Ion X

-1.5%

-47.4%

0.0%

-47.4%

▸

—

5CHf3C5qdCMr3c...Bb3wic6s2GCOREFlagged 35h+

Multi CPU -27.2% · Risk 100 · 9m lag · 5 failures

BLU View 5

+3.4%

-27.2%

-0.0%

-27.2%

▸

—

5CK8TtUMeAsCB9...TAUUbNtWr5COREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -54.9% · Single CPU -11.3% · Risk 100 · 14m lag · 3 failures

TCL Ion X

-11.3%

-54.9%

0.0%

-54.9%

▸

—

5CMuhFdopnis1p...o88DzHEn4YCOREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -22.0% · Risk 100 · 24m lag · 6 failures

Cricket Outlast 5G / AT&T Motivate Pro 5G

+3.3%

-22.0%

+0.0%

-22.0%

▸

—

5CoZCrCqRr5Ewn...FBdqmnANprCOREFlagged 35h+

Multi CPU -14.1% · Risk 100 · 10m lag · 1 failure

—

+7.5%

-14.1%

+0.0%

-14.1%

▸

—

5CuwCRb82qTsCB...EUxCaaWGZKCOREFlagged 12h

Multi CPU -46.7% · Risk 100 · 3m lag · 3 failures

—

+51.0%

-46.7%

-0.0%

-46.7%

▸

—

5CVSzoiQH8dgN4...UzRtWv9rHHCOREFlagged 17h

Multi CPU -22.5% · Single CPU -8.7% · Risk 100 · 25m lag · 3 failures

BLU View 5

-8.7%

-22.5%

0.0%

-22.5%

▸

—

5CwZSjhHbsKjyH...7Msg5CcTeFCOREFlagged 27h

Single CPU -36.7% · Risk 100 · 29m lag · 4 failures

—

-36.7%

+30.8%

+0.0%

-36.7%

▸

—

5DBHh5Fd2JapjW...5ry9YA3i2vCOREFlagged 15h

Multi CPU -27.2% · Risk 100 · 22m lag · 5 failures

TCL 50XE

+12.9%

-27.2%

+0.0%

-27.2%

▸

—

5DdcxNFEb7UGhA...mWeEoJa4BVCOREFlagged 18h

Single CPU -18.4% · Risk 100 · 51m lag · 4 failures · stale

—

-18.4%

+2.8%

+0.0%

-18.4%

▸

—

5DeHviNqev5nHx...eso9GY5e9MCOREFlagged 21h

Single CPU -17.4% · Multi CPU -13.4% · Risk 100 · 13m lag · 11 failures

TCL Ion X

-17.4%

-13.4%

0.0%

-17.4%

▸

—

5DjCZCT8iH6MmB...pqh9xYNWMLCOREFlagged 35h+

Multi CPU -55.6% · Single CPU -7.3% · Risk 100 · 31m lag · 5 failures

—

-7.3%

-55.6%

+0.0%

-55.6%

▸

—

5DLiLma5cUxqqG...ARNL9yMA8hCOREFlagged 21h

Multi CPU -39.0% · Risk 100 · 2m lag · 1 failure

BLU View 5

+45.0%

-39.0%

0.0%

-39.0%

▸

—

5DMgwdNDN1svrT...gteB2vHEjUCOREFlagged 14h

Multi CPU -32.8% · Single CPU -6.4% · Risk 100 · 12m lag · 3 failures

BLU View 5

-6.4%

-32.8%

0.0%

-32.8%

▸

—

5DPpVo13GKYTA3...1RcWpG3jUwCOREFlagged 9h

Multi CPU -13.9% · Risk 100 · 20m lag · 3 failures

TCL Ion X

+9.9%

-13.9%

0.0%

-13.9%

▸

—

5DPpWY8wmsJBYV...Co7Xm9FhLrCOREFlagged 21h

Multi CPU -19.0% · Single CPU -7.6% · Risk 100 · 12m lag · 8 failures

BLU View 5

-7.6%

-19.0%

-0.0%

-19.0%

▸

—

5DrRH5AHxZsPqV...6MR39tAyHYCOREFlagged 9h

Multi CPU -26.1% · Single CPU -9.3% · Risk 100 · 4m lag · 3 failures

—

-9.3%

-26.1%

-0.0%

-26.1%

▸

—

5DtKhRLHzjcVAA...HYvujYLEvuCOREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -15.0% · Risk 100 · 31m lag · 2 failures

TCL 50XE

-3.4%

-15.0%

+0.0%

-15.0%

▸

—

5EcuQo2d3SAUeW...bdAzs3PhFoCOREFlagged 25h

Single CPU -21.2% · Multi CPU -8.0% · Risk 100 · 25m lag · 4 failures

BLU View 5

-21.2%

-8.0%

0.0%

-21.2%

▸

—

5EdGPciTde3Ha8...vEGgyo7W2JCOREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -18.3% · Risk 100 · 19m lag · 7 failures

—

+15.2%

-18.3%

-0.0%

-18.3%

▸

—

5EFgUPTi5fVv3G...wWg5LDb5WeCOREFlagged 27h

Single CPU -25.7% · Risk 100 · 7m lag · 4 failures

TCL Ion X

-25.7%

+20.0%

0.0%

-25.7%

▸

—

5EKuLC7GgFFaCk...iNoS1inaCMCOREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -17.1% · Risk 100 · 26m lag · 5 failures

BLU View 5

+11.3%

-17.1%

0.0%

-17.1%

▸

—

5ERAeLEpbv61vQ...S3LnEzLP37COREFlagged 27h

Multi CPU -31.1% · Single CPU -8.1% · Risk 100 · 21m lag · 5 failures

—

-8.1%

-31.1%

+0.0%

-31.1%

▸

—

5Es9knA1njM2Me...3HMVN74bDnCOREFlagged 2h

Single CPU -12.5% · Risk 100 · 11m lag · 4 failures

BLU View 5

-12.5%

+8.7%

0.0%

-12.5%

▸

—

5EtqyqhBQFTk1D...UwMsUaWFgSCOREFlagged 27h

Multi CPU -38.8% · Risk 100 · 24m lag · 10 failures

—

+2.4%

-38.8%

-0.0%

-38.8%

▸

—

5EtvWyS6u5VMar...QzmtZBvDyPCOREFlagged 31h

Multi CPU -12.3% · Risk 100 · 11m lag · 6 failures

BLU View 5

-1.2%

-12.3%

0.0%

-12.3%

▸

—

5EyQucgTaDomjf...AgjVd1S9cHCOREFlagged 17h

Multi CPU -25.9% · Risk 100 · 6m lag · 6 failures

BLU View 5

+13.5%

-25.9%

0.0%

-25.9%

▸

—

5EZb2ZoSwex5rS...DK7HerxMoVCOREFlagged 25h

Single CPU -15.2% · Risk 100 · 4m lag · 1 failure

BLU View 5

-15.2%

+12.0%

0.0%

-15.2%

▸

—

5F3PcuGusFcgdh...3tYWoHtRh3COREFlagged 35h+

Multi CPU -19.4% · Risk 100 · 28m lag · 6 failures

BLU View 5

+13.7%

-19.4%

0.0%

-19.4%

▸

—

5F61DDDyn9L3Fd...Ad73wL5rc9COREFlagged 21h

Multi CPU -53.2% · Risk 100 · 2m lag · 8 failures

—

+29.5%

-53.2%

-0.0%

-53.2%

▸

—

5F626ji1kWwGwR...ceYtBpPNsXCOREFlagged 16h

Single CPU -26.6% · Multi CPU -11.7% · Risk 100 · 15m lag · 8 failures

TCL Ion X

-26.6%

-11.7%

0.0%

-26.6%

▸

—

5FbvTzC8Z3MmmC...s48XAbFqNaCOREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -13.8% · Risk 100 · 30m lag · 5 failures

—

-0.9%

-13.8%

0.0%

-13.8%

▸

—

5Fcup53MSnGjQN...iyKazterZmCOREFlagged 21h

Multi CPU -28.5% · Single CPU -21.2% · Risk 100 · 15m lag · 8 failures

TCL Ion X

-21.2%

-28.5%

0.0%

-28.5%

▸

—

5FgNDjur1mqyLH...JjvJZ83h18COREFlagged 12h

Single CPU -29.4% · Multi CPU -6.2% · Risk 100 · 9m lag · 5 failures

TCL 50XE

-29.4%

-6.2%

+0.0%

-29.4%

▸

—

5FnTAAN38HhrcR...r7LDvqdGW8COREFlagged 27h

Multi CPU -27.1% · Risk 100 · 12m lag · 10 failures

BLU View 5

-5.0%

-27.1%

0.0%

-27.1%

▸

—

5FpTkHXowPcRWH...2C7FQQjdqrCOREFlagged 33h

Multi CPU -11.7% · Single CPU -7.0% · Risk 100 · 13m lag · 9 failures

BLU View 5

-7.0%

-11.7%

0.0%

-11.7%

▸

—

5Fu4V1spA8jHrB...4LLeaUW7M1COREFlagged 25h

Single CPU -17.4% · Risk 100 · 20m lag · 12 failures

Motorola G Play 2024

-17.4%

+230.5%

-0.0%

-17.4%

▸

—

5Fu6yjABejipbS...5HXMTbagDxCOREFlagged 17h

Multi CPU -22.1% · Single CPU -10.7% · Risk 100 · 20m lag · 2 failures

BLU View 5

-10.7%

-22.1%

0.0%

-22.1%

▸

—

5Fwv7uGv8UEZjg...BQxcFNciRcCOREFlagged 25h

Single CPU -36.3% · Risk 100 · 2m lag · 12 failures

—

-36.3%

+16.2%

-0.0%

-36.3%

▸

—

5GaCDXpmHxmKBy...Xh9kf14vrQCOREFlagged 31h

Multi CPU -14.2% · Risk 100 · 10m lag · 4 failures

TCL Ion X

+7.3%

-14.2%

0.0%

-14.2%

▸

—

5GAmiTffBtodLv...yNpG8iScCECOREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -14.7% · Risk 100 · 23m lag · 7 failures

Cricket Outlast 5G / AT&T Motivate Pro 5G

+2.1%

-14.7%

+0.0%

-14.7%

▸

—

5GDdahgAbmPFxi...WQUN9MidroCOREFlagged 35h+

Multi CPU -18.7% · Single CPU -16.2% · Risk 100 · 16m lag · 6 failures

BLU View 5

-16.2%

-18.7%

-0.0%

-18.7%

▸

—

5GDkUVMZUfjB1w...ST2qUSmgvTCOREFlagged 20h

Multi CPU -34.2% · Risk 100 · 24m lag · 2 failures

—

-3.5%

-34.2%

+0.0%

-34.2%

▸

—

5GfbhAew6A5cPT...rSp8BX9gDXCOREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -12.4% · Risk 100 · 22m lag · 1 failure

—

+0.9%

-12.4%

0.0%

-12.4%

▸

—

5GGMUqEqfzdjM9...Gc23fgF5FgCOREFlagged 35h+

Multi CPU -12.4% · Risk 100 · 30m lag · 3 failures

BLU View 5

+3.5%

-12.4%

0.0%

-12.4%

▸

—

5GgzS2EsQGG4nt...6u2JBwhTteCOREFlagged 35h+

Multi CPU -15.9% · Risk 100 · 21m lag · 6 failures

BLU View 5

+2.1%

-15.9%

0.0%

-15.9%

▸

—

5GorN5yMHERkk4...TwgFmaLtamCOREFlagged 12h

Multi CPU -11.0% · Risk 100 · 11m lag · 5 failures

Samsung Galaxy A15 5G

+9.4%

-11.0%

+0.0%

-11.0%

▸

—

5GpoN7SsE6NpV4...9jj1ET4TYXCOREFlagged 35h+

Multi CPU -30.5% · Single CPU -5.3% · Risk 100 · 13m lag · 6 failures

BLU View 5

-5.3%

-30.5%

0.0%

-30.5%

▸

—

5GSeajKDVVzt8D...aVJFMRvWijCOREFlagged 21h

Multi CPU -12.2% · Risk 100 · 26m lag · 9 failures

BLU View 5

-1.5%

-12.2%

0.0%

-12.2%

▸

—

5GXLM6Dg3syQSx...GvpWxQKgEACOREFlagged 18h

Single CPU -11.5% · Multi CPU -6.7% · Risk 100 · 30m lag · 6 failures

BLU View 5

-11.5%

-6.7%

0.0%

-11.5%

▸

—

5GY1caujqmKSjV...Coq1kBQLCACOREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -42.6% · Risk 100 · 13m lag · 8 failures

TCL Ion X

+0.1%

-42.6%

0.0%

-42.6%

▸

—

5H2Q4pTwpXqS63...h6f6ycebGKCOREFlagged 21h

Single CPU -32.7% · Risk 100 · 2m lag · 8 failures

TCL Ion X

-32.7%

+7.4%

0.0%

-32.7%

▸

—

5H3G9ZKJtwSbxQ...83NxoRzfSvCOREFlagged 29h

Multi CPU -10.9% · Risk 100 · 28m lag · 7 failures

—

+24.4%

-10.9%

-0.0%

-10.9%

▸

—

5HEuthrRPxvDct...i81K4nwiwYCOREFlagged 35h+

Single CPU -21.1% · Multi CPU -15.2% · Risk 100 · 28m lag · 8 failures

—

-21.1%

-15.2%

+0.0%

-21.1%

▸

—

5HgkrprbKJvfao...zN8vFfaLyuCOREFlagged 14h

Multi CPU -19.1% · Risk 100 · 15m lag · 8 failures

BLU View 5

+7.6%

-19.1%

0.0%

-19.1%

▸

—

5HHxXkYos51hzP...e2KhY3sB7xCOREFlagged 14h

Multi CPU -28.0% · Risk 100 · 6m lag · 6 failures

—

+36.0%

-28.0%

+0.0%

-28.0%

▸

—

5HPtNvkEUwwj3D...mM9J16nMcdCOREFlagged 27h

Multi CPU -36.5% · Single CPU -35.6% · Risk 100 · 12m lag · 6 failures

BLU View 5

-35.6%

-36.5%

0.0%

-36.5%

▸

—

5HSP5eWvXwk2Q9...QwURq1CSsDCOREFlagged 25h

Multi CPU -11.8% · Risk 100 · 7m lag · 5 failures

BLU View 5

+8.7%

-11.8%

0.0%

-11.8%

▸

—

5Ce9ofy9deYUe7...LEXd6hxtfJCORE↑ 21 streak

4m lag · 5 failures

BLU View 5

-3.3%

+4.8%

0.0%

-3.3%

▸

—

5CpcnN7MXa5DCr...52Nbk84M9YCORE↑ 23 streak

11m lag · 9 failures

BLU View 5

+6.1%

-1.2%

0.0%

-1.2%

▸

—

5CPHwXRhumVSHR...KRnxg2dAUgCORE

7m lag · 6 failures

—

+1.5%

-3.8%

-0.0%

-3.8%

▸

—

5CqSTuUr7LJDmm...hqW5Pk5dRfLITE

32m lag · 10 failures

—

-1.4%

-1.7%

-0.0%

-1.7%

▸

—

5DnvjDSKAvkVtS...CotkeNPU6yCORE

30m lag · 13 failures

—

+94.1%

-3.9%

+0.0%

-3.9%

▸

—

5DtordeZNCTvjC...BCpTw7QcFyCORE↑ 19 streak

21m lag · 6 failures

—

-1.4%

-2.2%

+0.0%

-2.2%

▸

—

5EroGuFJYTsj8j...Pv92jvGPWECORE↑ 9 streak

11m lag · 5 failures

BLU View 5

-2.7%

+48.2%

0.0%

-2.7%

▸

—

5F1ueBk3QwaJsV...RdGTeEMkCgCORE

19m lag · 9 failures

—

+5.0%

-0.3%

-0.0%

-0.3%

▸

—

5FN29Hxhd5nZzr...V3A96vMZEgCORE

21m lag · 9 failures

—

-1.9%

+1.3%

-0.0%

-1.9%

▸

—

5FpB5Go364V2GH...5sVwL4MhtdCORE↑ 9 streak

18m lag · 7 failures

Motorola G Play 2024

+13.0%

+140.6%

-0.0%

▸

—

5GJmnBf6fBbSwJ...AstJoRGc8NCORE↑ 22 streak

17m lag · 6 failures

TCL 50XE

+8.0%

+40.8%

-0.0%

▸

—

5H5E8d4XN1EUK7...S3Xc7zNQjsCORE↑ 15 streak

21m lag · 12 failures

TCL 50XE

-2.3%

-3.2%

+0.0%

-3.2%

▸

—

5HdqcJbDeTGtCg...xeeJtp6jVNCORE

4m lag · 6 failures

BLU View 5

-3.8%

+4.7%

0.0%

-3.8%

▸

—

5HfE662tCG6eDd...NFGxHuvFEfCORE↑ 3 streak

25m lag · 6 failures

BLU View 5

-4.8%

+3.9%

0.0%

-4.8%

▸

—

5FK1yfNauKtmRw...2RNahZifeGCOREFlagged 43m

Single CPU -7.6% · 8m lag · 5 failures

BLU View 5

-7.6%

+11.2%

0.0%

-7.6%

▸

5DoYh1739tpDC2...s6RMqLFdMMCORESingle CPU -5.2% · Risk 77 · 16m lag · 2 failures

-5.2%▸

CPU 1c-5.2%

CPU Mc+10.2%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-5.2%

5DPe4JbGitJ8ZV...XeQfS8u5YnCOREMulti CPU -8.3% · Risk 77 · 27m lag · 2 failures

-8.3%▸

CPU 1c+0.2%

CPU Mc-8.3%

RAM0.0%

Worst-8.3%

5DTN67xMcT2sH5...wEBbJiePJ2CORESingle CPU -6.8% · Risk 77 · 23m lag · 2 failuresTCL Ion X

-6.8%▸

CPU 1c-6.8%

CPU Mc+11.3%

RAM0.0%

Worst-6.8%

5FRK5wD4cHdW6g...3yyW9AvMdBCOREMulti CPU -7.6% · Risk 77 · 14m lag · 1 failure

-7.6%▸

CPU 1c+0.0%

CPU Mc-7.6%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-7.6%

5GJNAiGsWJPQY1...6q6eZhmU6mCORESingle CPU -5.3% · Risk 77 · 8m lag · 1 failure

-5.3%▸

CPU 1c-5.3%

CPU Mc+21.4%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-5.3%

5CsxxxHBCHzPag...mUoJcE7TczCORESingle CPU -5.5% · Risk 87 · 20m lag · 3 failures

-5.5%▸

CPU 1c-5.5%

CPU Mc+49.5%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-5.5%

5Dk9oMHJFt7RSR...bSwGDdnQfsCOREMulti CPU -9.1% · Risk 87 · 5m lag · 4 failuresTCL Ion X

-9.1%▸

CPU 1c+21.8%

CPU Mc-9.1%

RAM0.0%

Worst-9.1%

5DQtQpLpPA4B5z...z3im9AMKkRCORESingle CPU -7.6% · Risk 87 · 26m lag · 4 failuresTCL 50XE

-7.6%▸

CPU 1c-7.6%

CPU Mc+26.2%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-7.6%

5DrGWoZDf9uqDP...V4g4kZxRuHCOREMulti CPU -5.5% · Risk 87 · 6m lag · 3 failures

-5.5%▸

CPU 1c-0.2%

CPU Mc-5.5%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-5.5%

5ETkkUGDWyGgj8...j9rhQ47dkeCOREMulti CPU -6.0% · Risk 87 · 3m lag · 3 failuresBLU View 5

-6.0%▸

CPU 1c-3.0%

CPU Mc-6.0%

RAM0.0%

Worst-6.0%

5Ga8RWsyB8hL97...FZFjtaoocbCORESingle CPU -6.0% · Risk 87 · 30m lag · 3 failures

-6.0%▸

CPU 1c-6.0%

CPU Mc+4.3%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-6.0%

5GTKWndd58UyJ1...drjHwn74jMCOREMulti CPU -8.6% · Risk 87 · 12m lag · 3 failures

-8.6%▸

CPU 1c+2.5%

CPU Mc-8.6%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-8.6%

5DVd7grcu3JLQZ...JEmmy7FU2vCORESingle CPU -5.8% · Risk 94 · 28m lag · 9 failuresBLU View 5

-5.8%▸

CPU 1c-5.8%

CPU Mc+9.3%

RAM0.0%

Worst-5.8%

5DXBm7wzdFBwbX...63MEN78JQwCOREMulti CPU -6.9% · Risk 94 · 3m lag · 4 failuresTCL Ion X

-6.9%▸

CPU 1c+1.7%

CPU Mc-6.9%

RAM0.0%

Worst-6.9%

5EKGbUkNgHEdSV...kDHSdkfeAsCOREMulti CPU -5.2% · Risk 94 · 4m lag · 10 failuresBLU View 5

-5.2%▸

CPU 1c+10.8%

CPU Mc-5.2%

RAM0.0%

Worst-5.2%

5FLiD2gKc88ZKt...vginmfsrp2COREMulti CPU -8.7% · Risk 94 · 5m lag · 10 failuresBLU View 5

-8.7%▸

CPU 1c+1.1%

CPU Mc-8.7%

RAM0.0%

Worst-8.7%

5Fp2gwsFjK3NBu...gfCQdYUDzgCOREMulti CPU -9.5% · Risk 94 · 2m lag · 7 failures

-9.5%▸

CPU 1c+6.0%

CPU Mc-9.5%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-9.5%

5GM4VGpH7wgHG6...PgVbeE8jGkCORESingle CPU -5.4% · Risk 94 · 2m lag · 6 failuresBLU View 5

-5.4%▸

CPU 1c-5.4%

CPU Mc+1.9%

RAM0.0%

Worst-5.4%

5GvayGR11hLU6b...1pRbuE4o4PCORESingle CPU -8.1% · Risk 94 · 7m lag · 9 failures

-8.1%▸

CPU 1c-8.1%

CPU Mc+48.9%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-8.1%

5E2vWknHm8V6Ny...sjdK8tmNwdCOREMulti CPU -12.4% · Risk 95 · 21m lag

-12.4%▸

CPU 1c+0.4%

CPU Mc-12.4%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-12.4%

5CGmQSLPG3Ze7c...Z72f3qvN1vCOREMulti CPU -47.4% · Risk 100 · 3m lag · 4 failuresTCL Ion X

-47.4%▸

CPU 1c-1.5%

CPU Mc-47.4%

RAM0.0%

Worst-47.4%

5CHf3C5qdCMr3c...Bb3wic6s2GCOREMulti CPU -27.2% · Risk 100 · 9m lag · 5 failuresBLU View 5

-27.2%▸

CPU 1c+3.4%

CPU Mc-27.2%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-27.2%

5CK8TtUMeAsCB9...TAUUbNtWr5COREMulti CPU -54.9% · Single CPU -11.3% · Risk 100 · 14m lag · 3 failuresTCL Ion X

-54.9%▸

CPU 1c-11.3%

CPU Mc-54.9%

RAM0.0%

Worst-54.9%

5CMuhFdopnis1p...o88DzHEn4YCOREMulti CPU -22.0% · Risk 100 · 24m lag · 6 failuresCricket Outlast 5G / AT&T Motivate Pro 5G

-22.0%▸

CPU 1c+3.3%

CPU Mc-22.0%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-22.0%

5CoZCrCqRr5Ewn...FBdqmnANprCOREMulti CPU -14.1% · Risk 100 · 10m lag · 1 failure

-14.1%▸

CPU 1c+7.5%

CPU Mc-14.1%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-14.1%

5CuwCRb82qTsCB...EUxCaaWGZKCOREMulti CPU -46.7% · Risk 100 · 3m lag · 3 failures

-46.7%▸

CPU 1c+51.0%

CPU Mc-46.7%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-46.7%

5CVSzoiQH8dgN4...UzRtWv9rHHCOREMulti CPU -22.5% · Single CPU -8.7% · Risk 100 · 25m lag · 3 failuresBLU View 5

-22.5%▸

CPU 1c-8.7%

CPU Mc-22.5%

RAM0.0%

Worst-22.5%

5CwZSjhHbsKjyH...7Msg5CcTeFCORESingle CPU -36.7% · Risk 100 · 29m lag · 4 failures

-36.7%▸

CPU 1c-36.7%

CPU Mc+30.8%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-36.7%

5DBHh5Fd2JapjW...5ry9YA3i2vCOREMulti CPU -27.2% · Risk 100 · 22m lag · 5 failuresTCL 50XE

-27.2%▸

CPU 1c+12.9%

CPU Mc-27.2%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-27.2%

5DdcxNFEb7UGhA...mWeEoJa4BVCORESingle CPU -18.4% · Risk 100 · 51m lag · 4 failures · stale

-18.4%▸

CPU 1c-18.4%

CPU Mc+2.8%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-18.4%

5DeHviNqev5nHx...eso9GY5e9MCORESingle CPU -17.4% · Multi CPU -13.4% · Risk 100 · 13m lag · 11 failuresTCL Ion X

-17.4%▸

CPU 1c-17.4%

CPU Mc-13.4%

RAM0.0%

Worst-17.4%

5DjCZCT8iH6MmB...pqh9xYNWMLCOREMulti CPU -55.6% · Single CPU -7.3% · Risk 100 · 31m lag · 5 failures

-55.6%▸

CPU 1c-7.3%

CPU Mc-55.6%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-55.6%

5DLiLma5cUxqqG...ARNL9yMA8hCOREMulti CPU -39.0% · Risk 100 · 2m lag · 1 failureBLU View 5

-39.0%▸

CPU 1c+45.0%

CPU Mc-39.0%

RAM0.0%

Worst-39.0%

5DMgwdNDN1svrT...gteB2vHEjUCOREMulti CPU -32.8% · Single CPU -6.4% · Risk 100 · 12m lag · 3 failuresBLU View 5

-32.8%▸

CPU 1c-6.4%

CPU Mc-32.8%

RAM0.0%

Worst-32.8%

5DPpVo13GKYTA3...1RcWpG3jUwCOREMulti CPU -13.9% · Risk 100 · 20m lag · 3 failuresTCL Ion X

-13.9%▸

CPU 1c+9.9%

CPU Mc-13.9%

RAM0.0%

Worst-13.9%

5DPpWY8wmsJBYV...Co7Xm9FhLrCOREMulti CPU -19.0% · Single CPU -7.6% · Risk 100 · 12m lag · 8 failuresBLU View 5

-19.0%▸

CPU 1c-7.6%

CPU Mc-19.0%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-19.0%

5DrRH5AHxZsPqV...6MR39tAyHYCOREMulti CPU -26.1% · Single CPU -9.3% · Risk 100 · 4m lag · 3 failures

-26.1%▸

CPU 1c-9.3%

CPU Mc-26.1%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-26.1%

5DtKhRLHzjcVAA...HYvujYLEvuCOREMulti CPU -15.0% · Risk 100 · 31m lag · 2 failuresTCL 50XE

-15.0%▸

CPU 1c-3.4%

CPU Mc-15.0%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-15.0%

5EcuQo2d3SAUeW...bdAzs3PhFoCORESingle CPU -21.2% · Multi CPU -8.0% · Risk 100 · 25m lag · 4 failuresBLU View 5

-21.2%▸

CPU 1c-21.2%

CPU Mc-8.0%

RAM0.0%

Worst-21.2%

5EdGPciTde3Ha8...vEGgyo7W2JCOREMulti CPU -18.3% · Risk 100 · 19m lag · 7 failures

-18.3%▸

CPU 1c+15.2%

CPU Mc-18.3%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-18.3%

5EFgUPTi5fVv3G...wWg5LDb5WeCORESingle CPU -25.7% · Risk 100 · 7m lag · 4 failuresTCL Ion X

-25.7%▸

CPU 1c-25.7%

CPU Mc+20.0%

RAM0.0%

Worst-25.7%

5EKuLC7GgFFaCk...iNoS1inaCMCOREMulti CPU -17.1% · Risk 100 · 26m lag · 5 failuresBLU View 5

-17.1%▸

CPU 1c+11.3%

CPU Mc-17.1%

RAM0.0%

Worst-17.1%

5ERAeLEpbv61vQ...S3LnEzLP37COREMulti CPU -31.1% · Single CPU -8.1% · Risk 100 · 21m lag · 5 failures

-31.1%▸

CPU 1c-8.1%

CPU Mc-31.1%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-31.1%

5Es9knA1njM2Me...3HMVN74bDnCORESingle CPU -12.5% · Risk 100 · 11m lag · 4 failuresBLU View 5

-12.5%▸

CPU 1c-12.5%

CPU Mc+8.7%

RAM0.0%

Worst-12.5%

5EtqyqhBQFTk1D...UwMsUaWFgSCOREMulti CPU -38.8% · Risk 100 · 24m lag · 10 failures

-38.8%▸

CPU 1c+2.4%

CPU Mc-38.8%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-38.8%

5EtvWyS6u5VMar...QzmtZBvDyPCOREMulti CPU -12.3% · Risk 100 · 11m lag · 6 failuresBLU View 5

-12.3%▸

CPU 1c-1.2%

CPU Mc-12.3%

RAM0.0%

Worst-12.3%

5EyQucgTaDomjf...AgjVd1S9cHCOREMulti CPU -25.9% · Risk 100 · 6m lag · 6 failuresBLU View 5

-25.9%▸

CPU 1c+13.5%

CPU Mc-25.9%

RAM0.0%

Worst-25.9%

5EZb2ZoSwex5rS...DK7HerxMoVCORESingle CPU -15.2% · Risk 100 · 4m lag · 1 failureBLU View 5

-15.2%▸

CPU 1c-15.2%

CPU Mc+12.0%

RAM0.0%

Worst-15.2%

5F3PcuGusFcgdh...3tYWoHtRh3COREMulti CPU -19.4% · Risk 100 · 28m lag · 6 failuresBLU View 5

-19.4%▸

CPU 1c+13.7%

CPU Mc-19.4%

RAM0.0%

Worst-19.4%

5F61DDDyn9L3Fd...Ad73wL5rc9COREMulti CPU -53.2% · Risk 100 · 2m lag · 8 failures

-53.2%▸

CPU 1c+29.5%

CPU Mc-53.2%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-53.2%

5F626ji1kWwGwR...ceYtBpPNsXCORESingle CPU -26.6% · Multi CPU -11.7% · Risk 100 · 15m lag · 8 failuresTCL Ion X

-26.6%▸

CPU 1c-26.6%

CPU Mc-11.7%

RAM0.0%

Worst-26.6%

5FbvTzC8Z3MmmC...s48XAbFqNaCOREMulti CPU -13.8% · Risk 100 · 30m lag · 5 failures

-13.8%▸

CPU 1c-0.9%

CPU Mc-13.8%

RAM0.0%

Worst-13.8%

5Fcup53MSnGjQN...iyKazterZmCOREMulti CPU -28.5% · Single CPU -21.2% · Risk 100 · 15m lag · 8 failuresTCL Ion X

-28.5%▸

CPU 1c-21.2%

CPU Mc-28.5%

RAM0.0%

Worst-28.5%

5FgNDjur1mqyLH...JjvJZ83h18CORESingle CPU -29.4% · Multi CPU -6.2% · Risk 100 · 9m lag · 5 failuresTCL 50XE

-29.4%▸

CPU 1c-29.4%

CPU Mc-6.2%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-29.4%

5FnTAAN38HhrcR...r7LDvqdGW8COREMulti CPU -27.1% · Risk 100 · 12m lag · 10 failuresBLU View 5

-27.1%▸

CPU 1c-5.0%

CPU Mc-27.1%

RAM0.0%

Worst-27.1%

5FpTkHXowPcRWH...2C7FQQjdqrCOREMulti CPU -11.7% · Single CPU -7.0% · Risk 100 · 13m lag · 9 failuresBLU View 5

-11.7%▸

CPU 1c-7.0%

CPU Mc-11.7%

RAM0.0%

Worst-11.7%

5Fu4V1spA8jHrB...4LLeaUW7M1CORESingle CPU -17.4% · Risk 100 · 20m lag · 12 failuresMotorola G Play 2024

-17.4%▸

CPU 1c-17.4%

CPU Mc+230.5%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-17.4%

5Fu6yjABejipbS...5HXMTbagDxCOREMulti CPU -22.1% · Single CPU -10.7% · Risk 100 · 20m lag · 2 failuresBLU View 5

-22.1%▸

CPU 1c-10.7%

CPU Mc-22.1%

RAM0.0%

Worst-22.1%

5Fwv7uGv8UEZjg...BQxcFNciRcCORESingle CPU -36.3% · Risk 100 · 2m lag · 12 failures

-36.3%▸

CPU 1c-36.3%

CPU Mc+16.2%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-36.3%

5GaCDXpmHxmKBy...Xh9kf14vrQCOREMulti CPU -14.2% · Risk 100 · 10m lag · 4 failuresTCL Ion X

-14.2%▸

CPU 1c+7.3%

CPU Mc-14.2%

RAM0.0%

Worst-14.2%

5GAmiTffBtodLv...yNpG8iScCECOREMulti CPU -14.7% · Risk 100 · 23m lag · 7 failuresCricket Outlast 5G / AT&T Motivate Pro 5G

-14.7%▸

CPU 1c+2.1%

CPU Mc-14.7%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-14.7%

5GDdahgAbmPFxi...WQUN9MidroCOREMulti CPU -18.7% · Single CPU -16.2% · Risk 100 · 16m lag · 6 failuresBLU View 5

-18.7%▸

CPU 1c-16.2%

CPU Mc-18.7%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-18.7%

5GDkUVMZUfjB1w...ST2qUSmgvTCOREMulti CPU -34.2% · Risk 100 · 24m lag · 2 failures

-34.2%▸

CPU 1c-3.5%

CPU Mc-34.2%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-34.2%

5GfbhAew6A5cPT...rSp8BX9gDXCOREMulti CPU -12.4% · Risk 100 · 22m lag · 1 failure

-12.4%▸

CPU 1c+0.9%

CPU Mc-12.4%

RAM0.0%

Worst-12.4%

5GGMUqEqfzdjM9...Gc23fgF5FgCOREMulti CPU -12.4% · Risk 100 · 30m lag · 3 failuresBLU View 5

-12.4%▸

CPU 1c+3.5%

CPU Mc-12.4%

RAM0.0%

Worst-12.4%

5GgzS2EsQGG4nt...6u2JBwhTteCOREMulti CPU -15.9% · Risk 100 · 21m lag · 6 failuresBLU View 5

-15.9%▸

CPU 1c+2.1%

CPU Mc-15.9%

RAM0.0%

Worst-15.9%

5GorN5yMHERkk4...TwgFmaLtamCOREMulti CPU -11.0% · Risk 100 · 11m lag · 5 failuresSamsung Galaxy A15 5G

-11.0%▸

CPU 1c+9.4%

CPU Mc-11.0%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-11.0%

5GpoN7SsE6NpV4...9jj1ET4TYXCOREMulti CPU -30.5% · Single CPU -5.3% · Risk 100 · 13m lag · 6 failuresBLU View 5

-30.5%▸

CPU 1c-5.3%

CPU Mc-30.5%

RAM0.0%

Worst-30.5%

5GSeajKDVVzt8D...aVJFMRvWijCOREMulti CPU -12.2% · Risk 100 · 26m lag · 9 failuresBLU View 5

-12.2%▸

CPU 1c-1.5%

CPU Mc-12.2%

RAM0.0%

Worst-12.2%

5GXLM6Dg3syQSx...GvpWxQKgEACORESingle CPU -11.5% · Multi CPU -6.7% · Risk 100 · 30m lag · 6 failuresBLU View 5

-11.5%▸

CPU 1c-11.5%

CPU Mc-6.7%

RAM0.0%

Worst-11.5%

5GY1caujqmKSjV...Coq1kBQLCACOREMulti CPU -42.6% · Risk 100 · 13m lag · 8 failuresTCL Ion X

-42.6%▸

CPU 1c+0.1%

CPU Mc-42.6%

RAM0.0%

Worst-42.6%

5H2Q4pTwpXqS63...h6f6ycebGKCORESingle CPU -32.7% · Risk 100 · 2m lag · 8 failuresTCL Ion X

-32.7%▸

CPU 1c-32.7%

CPU Mc+7.4%

RAM0.0%

Worst-32.7%

5H3G9ZKJtwSbxQ...83NxoRzfSvCOREMulti CPU -10.9% · Risk 100 · 28m lag · 7 failures

-10.9%▸

CPU 1c+24.4%

CPU Mc-10.9%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-10.9%

5HEuthrRPxvDct...i81K4nwiwYCORESingle CPU -21.1% · Multi CPU -15.2% · Risk 100 · 28m lag · 8 failures

-21.1%▸

CPU 1c-21.1%

CPU Mc-15.2%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-21.1%

5HgkrprbKJvfao...zN8vFfaLyuCOREMulti CPU -19.1% · Risk 100 · 15m lag · 8 failuresBLU View 5

-19.1%▸

CPU 1c+7.6%

CPU Mc-19.1%

RAM0.0%

Worst-19.1%

5HHxXkYos51hzP...e2KhY3sB7xCOREMulti CPU -28.0% · Risk 100 · 6m lag · 6 failures

-28.0%▸

CPU 1c+36.0%

CPU Mc-28.0%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-28.0%

5HPtNvkEUwwj3D...mM9J16nMcdCOREMulti CPU -36.5% · Single CPU -35.6% · Risk 100 · 12m lag · 6 failuresBLU View 5

-36.5%▸

CPU 1c-35.6%

CPU Mc-36.5%

RAM0.0%

Worst-36.5%

5HSP5eWvXwk2Q9...QwURq1CSsDCOREMulti CPU -11.8% · Risk 100 · 7m lag · 5 failuresBLU View 5

-11.8%▸

CPU 1c+8.7%

CPU Mc-11.8%

RAM0.0%

Worst-11.8%

5Ce9ofy9deYUe7...LEXd6hxtfJCORE4m lag · 5 failuresBLU View 5

-3.3%▸

CPU 1c-3.3%

CPU Mc+4.8%

RAM0.0%

Worst-3.3%

5CpcnN7MXa5DCr...52Nbk84M9YCORE11m lag · 9 failuresBLU View 5

-1.2%▸

CPU 1c+6.1%

CPU Mc-1.2%

RAM0.0%

Worst-1.2%

5CPHwXRhumVSHR...KRnxg2dAUgCORE7m lag · 6 failures

-3.8%▸

CPU 1c+1.5%

CPU Mc-3.8%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-3.8%

5CqSTuUr7LJDmm...hqW5Pk5dRfLITE32m lag · 10 failures

-1.7%▸

CPU 1c-1.4%

CPU Mc-1.7%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-1.7%

5DnvjDSKAvkVtS...CotkeNPU6yCORE30m lag · 13 failures

-3.9%▸

CPU 1c+94.1%

CPU Mc-3.9%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-3.9%

5DtordeZNCTvjC...BCpTw7QcFyCORE21m lag · 6 failures

-2.2%▸

CPU 1c-1.4%

CPU Mc-2.2%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-2.2%

5EroGuFJYTsj8j...Pv92jvGPWECORE11m lag · 5 failuresBLU View 5

-2.7%▸

CPU 1c-2.7%

CPU Mc+48.2%

RAM0.0%

Worst-2.7%

5F1ueBk3QwaJsV...RdGTeEMkCgCORE19m lag · 9 failures

-0.3%▸

CPU 1c+5.0%

CPU Mc-0.3%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-0.3%

5FN29Hxhd5nZzr...V3A96vMZEgCORE21m lag · 9 failures

-1.9%▸

CPU 1c-1.9%

CPU Mc+1.3%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-1.9%

5FpB5Go364V2GH...5sVwL4MhtdCORE18m lag · 7 failuresMotorola G Play 2024

-0.0%▸

CPU 1c+13.0%

CPU Mc+140.6%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-0.0%

5GJmnBf6fBbSwJ...AstJoRGc8NCORE17m lag · 6 failuresTCL 50XE

-0.0%▸

CPU 1c+8.0%

CPU Mc+40.8%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-0.0%

5H5E8d4XN1EUK7...S3Xc7zNQjsCORE21m lag · 12 failuresTCL 50XE

-3.2%▸

CPU 1c-2.3%

CPU Mc-3.2%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-3.2%

5HdqcJbDeTGtCg...xeeJtp6jVNCORE4m lag · 6 failuresBLU View 5

-3.8%▸

CPU 1c-3.8%

CPU Mc+4.7%

RAM0.0%

Worst-3.8%

5HfE662tCG6eDd...NFGxHuvFEfCORE25m lag · 6 failuresBLU View 5

-4.8%▸

CPU 1c-4.8%

CPU Mc+3.9%

RAM0.0%

Worst-4.8%

5FK1yfNauKtmRw...2RNahZifeGCORESingle CPU -7.6% · 8m lag · 5 failuresBLU View 5

-7.6%▸

CPU 1c-7.6%

CPU Mc+11.2%

RAM0.0%

Worst-7.6%