Phone Farm

Loading compute health board

Scoring retained benchmark history, confidence thresholds, and device compute regressions.

Resolving route12%

Acurast Pulse

Loading live view

Syncing chain state, reward ledgers, and fleet telemetry.

Resolving route12%

Manager Health #954 | Acurast Pulse

Manager #954 · compute baseline

Latest benchmark vs last 200 retained metric samples · ≥30 samples required to score

58.1% healthy·30d↓1.4pp

LiveUpdated just now·use cached

74 devices

43Healthy

13Watch

18Investigate

0Low confidence

17Regressions

44Improving

4Stale heartbeat

18Failures

1.9ACU/day at risk

Non-Green 31 Investigate 18 Watch 13 Healthy 43 Improving 44▥ Down in Compare ▥ Stale in Compare ▥ CPU variance in Compare ▥ Improving in Compare (7)

▥ Investigate in Compare (18) ▾

How are these conditions scored?Quick FAQ

● Healthy: All monitored pools (CPU 1c, CPU Mc, RAM) score within 5 % of this phone model's median. Treated as a good baseline — nothing to act on.
● Watch: At least one pool is 5–10 % below the model median on the latest run. A nudge, not yet an actionable problem.
● Investigate: At least one pool is 10 % or more below the model median. Persistent gaps that warrant a closer look — usually thermal throttling, background load, or a bad firmware release.
● Low confidence: The device hasn't reported enough benchmark runs to score it reliably. One of: brand-new device (first seen < 72 h ago), too few samples (< 30 baseline observations), or no benchmark history at all.
● Regressions: Devices with 3 or more consecutive non-healthy benchmark runs. A single bad run is noise; three in a row is a pattern. The streak resets the moment a healthy run lands.
● Improving: Devices with 3 or more trailing healthy runs immediately after at least one non-healthy run in recent history. The mirror of Regressions — recoveries worth celebrating, and a signal that whatever you changed is working.
● ACU/day at risk: Estimated daily ACU lost vs a healthy baseline, not the total earnings of flagged devices. Each non-healthy device's ACU/day is weighted by how far below its model median it scored — a device 12% below contributes ~12% of its earnings, not 100%. Watch and Investigate items without a measured delta fall back to status floors (5–10%).
● Stale heartbeat: Last heartbeat was over 50 minutes ago (stale) or over 6 hours ago (down). Healthy heartbeats land every ~50 minutes; anything past that suggests the device is offline or unreachable.
● Failures: Devices with a composite risk score ≥ 75. The score blends benchmark drop, heartbeat lag, and on-chain execution failures; the threshold marks devices that need attention soon.

Per-model rollup8 modelsClick to expand

Model	Devices	Healthy	Watch	Investigate	% Healthy	Improving
Untagged	23	0	9	14	0.0%	5
Samsung Flip 5	2	0	1	1	0.0%	1
Xiaomi 11T

ModelBuildSortShowing 31 of 31

Alias▽Processor▽Device▽CPU 1c▽CPU Mc▽RAM▽Worst▽Trend

—

5DB6xUPncjcxQk...jSoox6rPZKiOS↑ 23 streak

down · 3d lag · 2 failures

—

+0.0%

-0.0%

▸

—

5GczJfcYVs2EaV...zydqV86MVMiOS↑ 23 streak

down · 12d lag · 1 failure

—

+0.0%

-0.0%

▸

—

5Hf8koJZPKBnsC...jc87yF3mYJiOS↑ 23 streak

down · 1d lag · 1 failure

—

+0.6%

-1.1%

-0.0%

-1.1%

▸

—

5CJwdsMraPVdVy...n4TBKhcbLYiOS↑ 23 streak

down · 7h lag · 3 failures

—

+0.2%

-0.8%

-0.0%

-0.8%

▸

—

5FnQcgTQtmQQ8j...ZSm2eqLuUvCOREFlagged 20h

Multi CPU -5.0% · Risk 77 · 7m lag · 1 failure

—

+0.6%

-5.0%

+0.0%

-5.0%

▸

—

5CFGtwhwLd2voE...G7hdPaJ6vmiOSFlagged 9m

Multi CPU -14.5% · Single CPU -12.6% · Risk 79 · 30m lag · 2 failures

Apple iPhone 6s

-12.6%

-14.5%

-0.0%

-14.5%

▸

—

5Cf7c1eLa3aP5h...8AZpmexAfCiOSFlagged 41h

Multi CPU -5.9% · Risk 87 · 9m lag · 3 failures

Apple iPhone SE (2020)

-0.1%

-5.9%

-0.0%

-5.9%

▸

—

5FSMvrHy6cHJui...BVynA86xkxCOREFlagged 14h

Single CPU -6.1% · Risk 94 · 23m lag · 7 failures

—

-6.1%

-1.3%

-0.0%

-6.1%

▸

—

5CZRurrQxn9tAr...E45GpAvpqWCOREFlagged 29h

Single CPU -12.6% · Risk 95 · 14m lag

—

-12.6%

-4.8%

+0.0%

-12.6%

▸

—

5CWY3oEMvzzt5Q...MML6sQfnENCOREFlagged 41h

Single CPU -16.3% · Multi CPU -15.8% · Risk 100 · 17m lag · 5 failures

Samsung Flip 5

-16.3%

-15.8%

+0.0%

-16.3%

▸

—

5DfpF5N2Dhyyjb...gJeXiGh1NNCOREFlagged 41h

Single CPU -15.6% · Multi CPU -6.7% · Risk 100 · 26m lag · 3 failures

—

-15.6%

-6.7%

-0.0%

-15.6%

▸

—

5Dxwj7eC81nqTR...hF3WE7b242iOSFlagged 41h

Multi CPU -17.6% · Single CPU -13.9% · Risk 100 · 30m lag · 1 failure

—

-13.9%

-17.6%

-0.0%

-17.6%

▸

—

5EQGgQKDb7KEaK...E43E2qqXggCOREFlagged 41h

Multi CPU -20.6% · Risk 100 · 9m lag · 1 failure

—

-3.7%

-20.6%

-0.0%

-20.6%

▸

—

5EVTCwPsPurAvA...eawykZn719COREFlagged 41h

Multi CPU -14.6% · Risk 100 · 27m lag · 9 failures

—

-0.0%

-14.6%

-0.0%

-14.6%

▸

—

5Ewb3WzFwkeHGX...guPDV6Hvp7COREFlagged 28h

Single CPU -10.9% · Multi CPU -10.2% · Risk 100 · 1m lag · 2 failures

—

-10.9%

-10.2%

-0.0%

-10.9%

▸

—

5FH38ENcHFJpNA...gVSS3ZUcwhiOSFlagged 1h

Multi CPU -25.7% · Risk 100 · 30m lag · 1 failure

—

+2.8%

-25.7%

-0.0%

-25.7%

▸

—

5FH5wL4Mq2zA8y...xFkguMU9syiOSFlagged 41h

Multi CPU -66.1% · Single CPU -61.3% · Risk 100 · 23m lag · 2 failures

—

-61.3%

-66.1%

-0.0%

-66.1%

▸

—

5FHUALZJrRotwP...v5iWPrMHcvCOREFlagged 41h

Multi CPU -28.1% · Single CPU -17.5% · Risk 100 · 28m lag · 3 failures

—

-17.5%

-28.1%

+0.0%

-28.1%

▸

—

5Fsj13LPrvEsaP...HRLV6wEK5JiOSFlagged 1h

Multi CPU -26.1% · Risk 100 · 29m lag · 1 failure

—

-0.4%

-26.1%

+0.0%

-26.1%

▸

—

5GF8BRAYeTTqdz...8Ufd3B6KTuCOREFlagged 41h

Multi CPU -23.4% · Single CPU -21.4% · Risk 100 · 17m lag · 1 failure

—

-21.4%

-23.4%

+0.0%

-23.4%

▸

—

5GgDypDmK7ZiDk...XNNqeeUtumiOSFlagged 22h

Single CPU -29.9% · Multi CPU -28.8% · Risk 100 · 18m lag

—

-29.9%

-28.8%

-0.0%

-29.9%

▸

—

5H9g1XYSHH7sYk...97hX79ymNECOREFlagged 41h

Single CPU -24.1% · Multi CPU -14.1% · Risk 100 · 3m lag

Xiaomi 11T

-24.1%

-14.1%

-0.0%

-24.1%

▸

—

5CqqVyGgaFycpM...YVX8aKRxaWiOS

23m lag · 5 failures

Apple iPhone SE (2022)

+2.1%

-0.1%

-0.0%

-0.1%

▸

—

5CwMRhSVgKEtej...cigrG16qfZCORE↑ 23 streak

19m lag · 7 failures

Samsung Flip 5

+0.0%

-0.0%

+0.0%

-0.0%

▸

—

5DeSujUQ6bHmU7...B7EccPJuGuCORE↑ 6 streak

29m lag · 8 failures

Oppo Find X3 Lite

-4.5%

+0.6%

-0.0%

-4.5%

▸

—

5EwvcgMDqEUfUw...9H2hGJ1ACGCORE↑ 23 streak

9m lag · 8 failures

—

-0.2%

-2.7%

-0.0%

-2.7%

▸

—

5CxX62vp5B7EH9...DThmg1tRN2COREFlagged 9m

Multi CPU -5.8% · 19m lag

—

+0.3%

-5.8%

-0.0%

-5.8%

▸

—

5CgVMwCtf8rgWj...AgKoZqSrWoCOREFlagged 1h

Multi CPU -8.6% · 25m lag

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro

+0.7%

-8.6%

+0.0%

-8.6%

▸

—

5FHgCFMyJEwkkF...A7CBaBUhBgCOREFlagged 18h

Single CPU -7.6% · 1m lag

—

-7.6%

-4.3%

+0.0%

-7.6%

▸

—

5D95oR3QrA1mdz...JESJG1TM5GCOREFlagged 9m

Multi CPU -10.7% · 6m lag

—

+7.7%

-10.7%

+0.0%

-10.7%

▸

—

5F56JTkp5AFJq6...xLTFzYK9rJCOREFlagged 2h

Multi CPU -7.5% · Single CPU -5.9% · 20m lag · 1 failure

—

-5.9%

-7.5%

-0.0%

-7.5%

▸

5DB6xUPncjcxQk...jSoox6rPZKiOSdown · 3d lag · 2 failures

-0.0%▸

CPU 1c+0.0%

CPU Mc+0.0%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-0.0%

5GczJfcYVs2EaV...zydqV86MVMiOSdown · 12d lag · 1 failure

-0.0%▸

CPU 1c+0.0%

CPU Mc-0.0%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-0.0%

5Hf8koJZPKBnsC...jc87yF3mYJiOSdown · 1d lag · 1 failure

-1.1%▸

CPU 1c+0.6%

CPU Mc-1.1%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-1.1%

5CJwdsMraPVdVy...n4TBKhcbLYiOSdown · 7h lag · 3 failures

-0.8%▸

CPU 1c+0.2%

CPU Mc-0.8%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-0.8%

5FnQcgTQtmQQ8j...ZSm2eqLuUvCOREMulti CPU -5.0% · Risk 77 · 7m lag · 1 failure

-5.0%▸

CPU 1c+0.6%

CPU Mc-5.0%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-5.0%

5CFGtwhwLd2voE...G7hdPaJ6vmiOSMulti CPU -14.5% · Single CPU -12.6% · Risk 79 · 30m lag · 2 failuresApple iPhone 6s

-14.5%▸

CPU 1c-12.6%

CPU Mc-14.5%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-14.5%

5Cf7c1eLa3aP5h...8AZpmexAfCiOSMulti CPU -5.9% · Risk 87 · 9m lag · 3 failuresApple iPhone SE (2020)

-5.9%▸

CPU 1c-0.1%

CPU Mc-5.9%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-5.9%

5FSMvrHy6cHJui...BVynA86xkxCORESingle CPU -6.1% · Risk 94 · 23m lag · 7 failures

-6.1%▸

CPU 1c-6.1%

CPU Mc-1.3%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-6.1%

5CZRurrQxn9tAr...E45GpAvpqWCORESingle CPU -12.6% · Risk 95 · 14m lag

-12.6%▸

CPU 1c-12.6%

CPU Mc-4.8%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-12.6%

5CWY3oEMvzzt5Q...MML6sQfnENCORESingle CPU -16.3% · Multi CPU -15.8% · Risk 100 · 17m lag · 5 failuresSamsung Flip 5

-16.3%▸

CPU 1c-16.3%

CPU Mc-15.8%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-16.3%

5DfpF5N2Dhyyjb...gJeXiGh1NNCORESingle CPU -15.6% · Multi CPU -6.7% · Risk 100 · 26m lag · 3 failures

-15.6%▸

CPU 1c-15.6%

CPU Mc-6.7%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-15.6%

5Dxwj7eC81nqTR...hF3WE7b242iOSMulti CPU -17.6% · Single CPU -13.9% · Risk 100 · 30m lag · 1 failure

-17.6%▸

CPU 1c-13.9%

CPU Mc-17.6%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-17.6%

5EQGgQKDb7KEaK...E43E2qqXggCOREMulti CPU -20.6% · Risk 100 · 9m lag · 1 failure

-20.6%▸

CPU 1c-3.7%

CPU Mc-20.6%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-20.6%

5EVTCwPsPurAvA...eawykZn719COREMulti CPU -14.6% · Risk 100 · 27m lag · 9 failures

-14.6%▸

CPU 1c-0.0%

CPU Mc-14.6%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-14.6%

5Ewb3WzFwkeHGX...guPDV6Hvp7CORESingle CPU -10.9% · Multi CPU -10.2% · Risk 100 · 1m lag · 2 failures

-10.9%▸

CPU 1c-10.9%

CPU Mc-10.2%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-10.9%

5FH38ENcHFJpNA...gVSS3ZUcwhiOSMulti CPU -25.7% · Risk 100 · 30m lag · 1 failure

-25.7%▸

CPU 1c+2.8%

CPU Mc-25.7%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-25.7%

5FH5wL4Mq2zA8y...xFkguMU9syiOSMulti CPU -66.1% · Single CPU -61.3% · Risk 100 · 23m lag · 2 failures

-66.1%▸

CPU 1c-61.3%

CPU Mc-66.1%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-66.1%

5FHUALZJrRotwP...v5iWPrMHcvCOREMulti CPU -28.1% · Single CPU -17.5% · Risk 100 · 28m lag · 3 failures

-28.1%▸

CPU 1c-17.5%

CPU Mc-28.1%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-28.1%

5Fsj13LPrvEsaP...HRLV6wEK5JiOSMulti CPU -26.1% · Risk 100 · 29m lag · 1 failure

-26.1%▸

CPU 1c-0.4%

CPU Mc-26.1%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-26.1%

5GF8BRAYeTTqdz...8Ufd3B6KTuCOREMulti CPU -23.4% · Single CPU -21.4% · Risk 100 · 17m lag · 1 failure

-23.4%▸

CPU 1c-21.4%

CPU Mc-23.4%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-23.4%

5GgDypDmK7ZiDk...XNNqeeUtumiOSSingle CPU -29.9% · Multi CPU -28.8% · Risk 100 · 18m lag

-29.9%▸

CPU 1c-29.9%

CPU Mc-28.8%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-29.9%

5H9g1XYSHH7sYk...97hX79ymNECORESingle CPU -24.1% · Multi CPU -14.1% · Risk 100 · 3m lagXiaomi 11T

-24.1%▸

CPU 1c-24.1%

CPU Mc-14.1%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-24.1%

5CqqVyGgaFycpM...YVX8aKRxaWiOS23m lag · 5 failuresApple iPhone SE (2022)

-0.1%▸

CPU 1c+2.1%

CPU Mc-0.1%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-0.1%

5CwMRhSVgKEtej...cigrG16qfZCORE19m lag · 7 failuresSamsung Flip 5

-0.0%▸

CPU 1c+0.0%

CPU Mc-0.0%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-0.0%

5DeSujUQ6bHmU7...B7EccPJuGuCORE29m lag · 8 failuresOppo Find X3 Lite

-4.5%▸

CPU 1c-4.5%

CPU Mc+0.6%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-4.5%

5EwvcgMDqEUfUw...9H2hGJ1ACGCORE9m lag · 8 failures

-2.7%▸

CPU 1c-0.2%

CPU Mc-2.7%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-2.7%

5CxX62vp5B7EH9...DThmg1tRN2COREMulti CPU -5.8% · 19m lag

-5.8%▸

CPU 1c+0.3%

CPU Mc-5.8%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-5.8%

5CgVMwCtf8rgWj...AgKoZqSrWoCOREMulti CPU -8.6% · 25m lagXiaomi Poco X3 Pro

-8.6%▸

CPU 1c+0.7%

CPU Mc-8.6%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-8.6%

5FHgCFMyJEwkkF...A7CBaBUhBgCORESingle CPU -7.6% · 1m lag

-7.6%▸

CPU 1c-7.6%

CPU Mc-4.3%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-7.6%

5D95oR3QrA1mdz...JESJG1TM5GCOREMulti CPU -10.7% · 6m lag

-10.7%▸

CPU 1c+7.7%

CPU Mc-10.7%

RAM+0.0%

Worst-10.7%

5F56JTkp5AFJq6...xLTFzYK9rJCOREMulti CPU -7.5% · Single CPU -5.9% · 20m lag · 1 failure

-7.5%▸

CPU 1c-5.9%

CPU Mc-7.5%

RAM-0.0%

Worst-7.5%